Certified Protection Professional (CPP) Practice Exam

Question: 1 / 400

What is a significant disadvantage of a reactionary security posture?

It improves employee training programs

It allows for proactive risk management

It can lead to increased vulnerability and damage

A reactionary security posture primarily responds to incidents or threats after they have occurred rather than implementing measures to prevent them. This reactive approach can result in a heightened level of vulnerability because it does not anticipate and mitigate potential risks before they manifest. As a result, the organization may experience greater damages—both physical and reputational—due to past events that could have been addressed proactively. A reactionary stance often leads to a cycle where security measures only evolve after suffering a loss, thereby delaying improvements that could have safeguarded the organization beforehand.

The other choices point to benefits that are associated more with proactive security measures rather than with a reactionary stance. Enhancing employee training, improving risk management routines, and boosting operational efficiency all contribute toward creating a more secure environment but do not align with the fundamental nature of a reactionary strategy. This emphasizes the importance of adopting proactive measures to effectively manage security threats and vulnerabilities.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

It enhances operational efficiency

Next Question

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy