What is a significant disadvantage of a reactionary security posture?

A reactionary security posture primarily responds to incidents or threats after they have occurred rather than implementing measures to prevent them. This reactive approach can result in a heightened level of vulnerability because it does not anticipate and mitigate potential risks before they manifest. As a result, the organization may experience greater damages—both physical and reputational—due to past events that could have been addressed proactively. A reactionary stance often leads to a cycle where security measures only evolve after suffering a loss, thereby delaying improvements that could have safeguarded the organization beforehand.

The other choices point to benefits that are associated more with proactive security measures rather than with a reactionary stance. Enhancing employee training, improving risk management routines, and boosting operational efficiency all contribute toward creating a more secure environment but do not align with the fundamental nature of a reactionary strategy. This emphasizes the importance of adopting proactive measures to effectively manage security threats and vulnerabilities.